<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Store 3.0 beta starting today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steamreview.org/posts/store3betatoday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/store3betatoday/</link>
	<description>Comment and discussion on Valve Software's digital communications platform.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ATimson</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/store3betatoday/#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>ATimson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 04:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamreview.org/?p=99#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>True. But at $9.95, it's effectively $10; might as well group them in the $10 category, and avoid the asymmetry they have now. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. But at $9.95, it&#8217;s effectively $10; might as well group them in the $10 category, and avoid the asymmetry they have now. <img src='http://steamreview.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jobye</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/store3betatoday/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jobye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamreview.org/?p=99#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>I don't think that's a ploy Timson, remember GMog is being sold on Steam? It is said that it would be 10$, but you know how prices on Steam are never round numbers like that. So, 9.95$. Also, most back-catalogue games are priced at 9.95$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a ploy Timson, remember GMog is being sold on Steam? It is said that it would be 10$, but you know how prices on Steam are never round numbers like that. So, 9.95$. Also, most back-catalogue games are priced at 9.95$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ATimson</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/store3betatoday/#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>ATimson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamreview.org/?p=99#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Points to note: There’s a heading for games priced from $1 to $10. Either that’s some creative marketing, or they’re thinking of pricing something below the $9.95 mark.&lt;/i&gt;

Or, that's just leftover from the fact that it was a last-minute fix after the beta start, and they'll be changing it so that $9.95 is included in the $10 category. *shrug*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Points to note: There’s a heading for games priced from $1 to $10. Either that’s some creative marketing, or they’re thinking of pricing something below the $9.95 mark.</i></p>
<p>Or, that&#8217;s just leftover from the fact that it was a last-minute fix after the beta start, and they&#8217;ll be changing it so that $9.95 is included in the $10 category. *shrug*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wizpig64</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/store3betatoday/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>wizpig64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamreview.org/?p=99#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>The Friends window had a Beta tag also, but thats been out officially for months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Friends window had a Beta tag also, but thats been out officially for months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ally</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/store3betatoday/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamreview.org/?p=99#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>yey thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yey thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Edwards</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/store3betatoday/#comment-1245</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamreview.org/?p=99#comment-1245</guid>
		<description>Has anyone else noticed that the Steam window on &lt;a href="http://storefront.steampowered.com/v/index.php?area=getsteamnow" rel="nofollow"&gt;the new Get Steam Now page&lt;/a&gt; has a '[Beta]' tag? It's got the My Media tab and everything, so it can't be an old shot with the new Store pasted over.

(Before anyone suggests that it might be an internal thing, that would make it [Alpha])</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone else noticed that the Steam window on <a href="http://storefront.steampowered.com/v/index.php?area=getsteamnow" >the new Get Steam Now page</a> has a &#8216;[Beta]&#8216; tag? It&#8217;s got the My Media tab and everything, so it can&#8217;t be an old shot with the new Store pasted over.</p>
<p>(Before anyone suggests that it might be an internal thing, that would make it [Alpha])</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
