<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New website: Steam Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steamreview.org/posts/steamreport/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/steamreport/</link>
	<description>Comment and discussion on Valve Software's digital communications platform.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ortzinator</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/steamreport/#comment-4552</link>
		<dc:creator>Ortzinator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 01:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/?p=169#comment-4552</guid>
		<description>Personally, I don't like the filler such as the reports on game updates. The Steam news thread is already in my reader...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t like the filler such as the reports on game updates. The Steam news thread is already in my reader&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/steamreport/#comment-4551</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/?p=169#comment-4551</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy - Andy from Steam Report here!
You're right, our editorials aren't anywhere near as good as what is here, as we don't really have that many yet! At the moment we're still ironing out the kinks in the code and getting things off the ground, but we do have some really interesting editorials lined up! 
We're nearly there, so just bear with us!

Oh, and Steam Review, many thanks for the mention!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy - Andy from Steam Report here!<br />
You&#8217;re right, our editorials aren&#8217;t anywhere near as good as what is here, as we don&#8217;t really have that many yet! At the moment we&#8217;re still ironing out the kinks in the code and getting things off the ground, but we do have some really interesting editorials lined up!<br />
We&#8217;re nearly there, so just bear with us!</p>
<p>Oh, and Steam Review, many thanks for the mention!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Simpson</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/steamreport/#comment-4550</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/?p=169#comment-4550</guid>
		<description>Their editorials aren't nearly as good as the ones on here, though.

Mostly, you've just suffered from a lack of anything really interesting happening for a while! Community was released something like 8 months ago, and Steamworks is interesting, but only if/when a) it gets used on a large scale, b) it becomes more publically available.

Things just aren't changing as fast as they used to.

Hopefully the huge update that'll add P2P and built-in mod distribution support will appear soon and blow us all away!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their editorials aren&#8217;t nearly as good as the ones on here, though.</p>
<p>Mostly, you&#8217;ve just suffered from a lack of anything really interesting happening for a while! Community was released something like 8 months ago, and Steamworks is interesting, but only if/when a) it gets used on a large scale, b) it becomes more publically available.</p>
<p>Things just aren&#8217;t changing as fast as they used to.</p>
<p>Hopefully the huge update that&#8217;ll add P2P and built-in mod distribution support will appear soon and blow us all away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
