<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Splash Damage: &#8220;Steam is a third platform&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/</link>
	<description>Comment and discussion on Valve Software's digital communications platform.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Not from North America? Let publishers hear your voice in a decent way - Page 16 - Steam Users Forums</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4594</link>
		<dc:creator>Not from North America? Let publishers hear your voice in a decent way - Page 16 - Steam Users Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 07:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4594</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Originally Posted by jmace86   Good letter. Should Steam not be the fourth platform though, after the PS3, X360 and Wii. The Wii is a platform as well.     The industry sees the Wii as a whole different platform then the PC, Xbox and PS3. It's more mainstream if you will. It's also a direct quote from a developer: http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/ [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://steamreview.org/home/.quirin/varsity/steamreview.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Originally Posted by jmace86   Good letter. Should Steam not be the fourth platform though, after the PS3, X360 and Wii. The Wii is a platform as well.     The industry sees the Wii as a whole different platform then the PC, Xbox and PS3. It&#8217;s more mainstream if you will. It&#8217;s also a direct quote from a developer: <a href="http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/" >http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Edwards</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4468</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4468</guid>
		<description>Because they don't have to give a share of their royalties to either of those groups. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because they don&#8217;t have to give a share of their royalties to either of those groups. <img src='http://steamreview.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Timson</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Timson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="4466"]On the other hand, WoW is so huge, it would warrant the development of an own distribution system. Why Blizzard didn't do this already is strange. They have their BitTorrent downloader, but that is nothing compared to Steam.[/quote]
The only reason I see Blizzard starting their own is because their games are cross-platform, PC and Mac. Otherwise, they've been more than happy to adapt existing technology for their uses so far (DivX, BitTorrent); why would they stop now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4466"><p>
On the other hand, WoW is so huge, it would warrant the development of an own distribution system. Why Blizzard didn&#8217;t do this already is strange. They have their BitTorrent downloader, but that is nothing compared to Steam.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The only reason I see Blizzard starting their own is because their games are cross-platform, PC and Mac. Otherwise, they&#8217;ve been more than happy to adapt existing technology for their uses so far (DivX, BitTorrent); why would they stop now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demm</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4466</link>
		<dc:creator>demm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4466</guid>
		<description>Wow, Epic is on Steam. Now Steam is the platform for the FPS/action genre, but the catalogue still lacks in RTS and MMORPG games. That's funny, because those are the genres in which the PC is typically stronger than consoles.

Regarding 'Activision Blizzard': Activision merged with Vivendi Games. Vivendi games is the owner of Blizzard Entertainment, Sierra Entertainment, Sierra
Online, and Vivendi Games Mobile. Blizzard is the only profitable, and by far the biggest division of Vivendi Games, so they decided to name the merged Company after it.

The combined Activsion Blizzard is quite a big Publisher and I guess since they already have some of their games on Steam, it would be possible that they decide to put even more on it.
On the other hand, WoW is so huge, it would warrant the development of an own distribution system. Why Blizzard didn't do this already is strange. They have their BitTorrent downloader, but that is nothing compared to Steam.

My bet is, that Activision Blizzard is too greedy to use a 3rd party distribution system and that they will not use Steam for any of the Blizzard titles.
On the other hand, I really hope they would...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Epic is on Steam. Now Steam is the platform for the FPS/action genre, but the catalogue still lacks in RTS and MMORPG games. That&#8217;s funny, because those are the genres in which the PC is typically stronger than consoles.</p>
<p>Regarding &#8216;Activision Blizzard&#8217;: Activision merged with Vivendi Games. Vivendi games is the owner of Blizzard Entertainment, Sierra Entertainment, Sierra<br />
Online, and Vivendi Games Mobile. Blizzard is the only profitable, and by far the biggest division of Vivendi Games, so they decided to name the merged Company after it.</p>
<p>The combined Activsion Blizzard is quite a big Publisher and I guess since they already have some of their games on Steam, it would be possible that they decide to put even more on it.<br />
On the other hand, WoW is so huge, it would warrant the development of an own distribution system. Why Blizzard didn&#8217;t do this already is strange. They have their BitTorrent downloader, but that is nothing compared to Steam.</p>
<p>My bet is, that Activision Blizzard is too greedy to use a 3rd party distribution system and that they will not use Steam for any of the Blizzard titles.<br />
On the other hand, I really hope they would&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Edwards</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4465</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4465</guid>
		<description>They merged with Blizzard, not Vivendi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They merged with Blizzard, not Vivendi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Timson</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4463</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Timson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/posts/splashdamage/#comment-4463</guid>
		<description>Vivendi wasn't. But my understanding from reading the details is that the Activision/Vivendi "merger" was more of a buyout by Activision&#8212;who &lt;i&gt;don't&lt;/i&gt; have a problem with Steam, at least for their current releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vivendi wasn&#8217;t. But my understanding from reading the details is that the Activision/Vivendi &#8220;merger&#8221; was more of a buyout by Activision&mdash;who <i>don&#8217;t</i> have a problem with Steam, at least for their current releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
