<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bioshock&#8217;s eventful retail release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/</link>
	<description>Comment and discussion on Valve Software's digital communications platform.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: toto952</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3592</link>
		<dc:creator>toto952</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3592</guid>
		<description>Actually, when you uninstall the game, at least on the DVD version, you do not get one "activation credit" back. It is unclear what happens when you clear the Steam cache of this game.

Moreover, at least on the DVD version, if you use the game on a machine with multiple accounts, it will consume one activation credit per user.

A few days after release, Take 2 has promised to release a "revoke tool", but nobody now when it will be available, and  it's not clear how it will work and it will really solve all problems. The lead dev also promise that the online activation may be removed at some points in the future but he also admitted at the same time that he has no decision power on those kind of issue.

At least, Valve had the decency to had a (small) notice on the product page about the install limit, but it somehow ruins the credibility of the "one account, play anywhere" promise which is the foundation of Steam (and which has never been guaranteed in the Steam Subscriber Agreement by the way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, when you uninstall the game, at least on the DVD version, you do not get one &#8220;activation credit&#8221; back. It is unclear what happens when you clear the Steam cache of this game.</p>
<p>Moreover, at least on the DVD version, if you use the game on a machine with multiple accounts, it will consume one activation credit per user.</p>
<p>A few days after release, Take 2 has promised to release a &#8220;revoke tool&#8221;, but nobody now when it will be available, and  it&#8217;s not clear how it will work and it will really solve all problems. The lead dev also promise that the online activation may be removed at some points in the future but he also admitted at the same time that he has no decision power on those kind of issue.</p>
<p>At least, Valve had the decency to had a (small) notice on the product page about the install limit, but it somehow ruins the credibility of the &#8220;one account, play anywhere&#8221; promise which is the foundation of Steam (and which has never been guaranteed in the Steam Subscriber Agreement by the way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kapitein Iglo</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3569</link>
		<dc:creator>Kapitein Iglo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3569</guid>
		<description>www.steamgames.com
www.steamcommunity.com
www.steammovies.com ?! Same placeholder as the one for steamcommunity.com. http://whois.domaintools.com/steammovies.com

Anyway, when can we expect the steamreview group? I've been waiting for it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.steamgames.com" >http://www.steamgames.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.steamcommunity.com" >http://www.steamcommunity.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.steammovies.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.steammovies.com</a> ?! Same placeholder as the one for steamcommunity.com. <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/steammovies.com" >http://whois.domaintools.com/steammovies.com</a></p>
<p>Anyway, when can we expect the steamreview group? I&#8217;ve been waiting for it <img src='http://steamreview.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3501</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3501</guid>
		<description>Great game, last night when I went to play AVG called Bioshock a virus and deleted the main .exe file.

I had to uninstall AVG, install Avast and reinstall the game. I guess the latest AVG update makes it think that Bioshock is a virus.

Otherwise, great game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great game, last night when I went to play AVG called Bioshock a virus and deleted the main .exe file.</p>
<p>I had to uninstall AVG, install Avast and reinstall the game. I guess the latest AVG update makes it think that Bioshock is a virus.</p>
<p>Otherwise, great game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Edwards</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3500</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3500</guid>
		<description>Finished! A truly excellent twenty-four hours of game. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finished! A truly excellent twenty-four hours of game. <img src='http://steamreview.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demm</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3479</link>
		<dc:creator>demm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3479</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="3476"]
It must be really crappy, because you did get it but you didn't notice. ;-)[/quote]
A little thing called sarcasm... I guess I should be more careful with what I type. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3476">
<p>It must be really crappy, because you did get it but you didn&#8217;t notice. <img src='http://steamreview.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
</blockquote>
<p>A little thing called sarcasm&#8230; I guess I should be more careful with what I type. <img src='http://steamreview.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ATimson</title>
		<link>http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3478</link>
		<dc:creator>ATimson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3478</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="3475"]A friend and I both got the second pre-load part, but we both had to verify the game cache and it set us back to about 85%.
Honestly I can't understand how this could happen. Neither Steam nor the game cares if data is missing... wth?[/quote]
The game is doing the smart thing, and continuing as best it can (though it's probably throwing errors to the console and log files).

Steam, on the other hand, &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; have noticed. That's, well, not good that it didn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://steamreview.org/posts/bioshockretail/#comment-3475"><p>
A friend and I both got the second pre-load part, but we both had to verify the game cache and it set us back to about 85%.<br />
Honestly I can&#8217;t understand how this could happen. Neither Steam nor the game cares if data is missing&#8230; wth?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The game is doing the smart thing, and continuing as best it can (though it&#8217;s probably throwing errors to the console and log files).</p>
<p>Steam, on the other hand, <i>should</i> have noticed. That&#8217;s, well, not good that it didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
